Are you an upholder, a questioner, an obliger or a rebel? Figuring out your cognitive house might be the key to changing your bad tech habits for good.

See more friends. Take more walks. Read more books. Get more sleep. Why don’t those intentions stick? You want to change. But it doesn’t seem to take. Maybe you just haven’t identified what house you’re in.

Gretchen Rubin, mega-bestselling author of The Happiness Project, says the key to long-term habit change is understanding how we respond to expectations. She names four broad categories of responders: the Ravenclaw, Gryffindor, Hufflepuff and Slytherin of habit-changing. Figuring out your cognitive house might be the key to changing your bad habits for good. Including one habit we hear about a lot: clinging to the phone right up until our eyes drop closed.

If you want to know which house you’re in, there’s a handy quiz. An online sorting hat, if you will. Manoush is a Questioner. Obviously.

There's been a lot of negative press lately about algorithms (Facebook, Snapchat, the prison system). But this week we're exploring ways that mathematical and scientific algorithms can actually help improve how we live.

Brian Christian co-wrote the book "Algorithms to Live By" with his friend, Tom Griffiths, a psychology and cognitive science professor at UC Berkeley. Brian is all about the intersection of technology and humanity, and figuring out how to use data to help people optimize their lives.

In their book, Brian and Tom offer really practical applications for scientific principles, which we'll get to in a minute. But first, here's the catch: There’s no formula for perfection. Even if you apply these algorithms to your life, things will go wrong. But by trying out these algorithms, you can statistically give it your best shot.

In part one of this two-part series about practical applications for algorithms, Brian tells Manoush about six small changes anyone can try.

1. Temporal Locality

This algorithm posits that the paper you're most likely to use next, is the last one you touched. So that pile of papers on your desk? You have a scientific reason to never organize them. The most relevant stuff will rise to the top.
=> natural reverse order for papers on desk

2. The Search/Sort Trade-off

If you tag and file your emails, you might be wasting your time. Weigh the amount of time you spend organizing against the amount of time it takes to use the good ol' search function.
=> no point to sort e-mail thanks to search tool

3. Computational Kindness

The next time you try to plan a meeting, skip the classic line, "I'm totally free." Brian calls this "Passing the computational buck." Instead, ask a binary question like "Are you free for dinner at 5 p.m. on Thursday?" It may go against the rules of etiquette, but setting a specific window for availability should be more efficient.
=> Poser des questions binaires "computation kindness" rends plus facile la communication et la prise de décision

4. Cache Miss

There's a fundamental trade-off between size and speed. The more we know — the more data we collect in our minds — the more likely we are to have a brain fart.
=> when getting older, we have more data when remembering sth, one way more positive to see it.

5. The Explore/Exploit Trade-off

The more experiences you have, the less likely it is that something will blow your mind. That's why Manoush has such fond memories from a Squeeze concert she went to in ninth grade. It may not have actually been that incredible, but she had less to compare it to.
=> life is balanced between what you already love and new experience you will try

6. Radix Sort

You might be compelled to sort your kid's Legos (or yours, this is a judgement-free zone) by color. But radix sort says efficiency trumps aesthetic. Try sorting by size instead.

Apprendre à distinguer zone d'apprentissage et zone de performance

Apprentissage
But s'améliorer
On se concentre sur des choses qu'on ne maîtrise pas encore
On s'attend à faire des erreurs

Performance
Le but est de faire de notre mieux
On exécute des actions qu'on maîtrise avec le plus d'efficacité possible
On minimise au maximum les erreurs

L'idée c'est de régulièrement se mettre dans un contexte d'apprentissage dans lequel les erreurs ne sont pas dommageables qui va nous faire progresser et qu'on pourra ensuite ajouter à nos compétences d'exécution dans la zone de performance.

Problème à l'école on nous place déjà dans un contexte de performance où on cherche à éviter les erreurs au lieu de les accepter et de les utiliser comme base de travail pour progresser.

Exemple de Beyoncé qui après chaque spectacle analyse sa performance et identifie des améliorations sur lesquels travailler pour les prochains

C'est faux de dire qu'on n'a pas le temps, ce n'est qu'une question de priorité, de choix.

Professionnel
Plutôt que faire le year end review en passant en revue nos actions de l'année
Imaginer le rdv de l'an suivant en imaginant les actions qu'on jugera comme une réussite , durant cette année d'exception

A appliquer sur la vie perso également

Et là pour atteindre nos objectifs, on va commencer à s'organiser/planifier notre temps.

3 catégories

Carrière
Relations
Soi-même

168 heures par semaines
Il reste 72h en décomptant 40h de travail /sem et 8h de sommeil /nuit

Ça laisse pas mal de temps pour faire de belles choses